Dr Pascal Gervaz

Chirurgien FMH, chirurgie interne & chirurgie viscérale

 

 

A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Sigmoid Diverticulitis Episodes 1 and 2

 

 

by Gervaz P, Platon A, Widmer L, Ambrosetti P, Poletti PA.

 

 

Aim 

After an initial uncomplicated attack, sigmoid diverticulitis may recur, but the morphological characteristics of recurrent diverticulitis have not been investigated. We compared the clinical and radiological severity, the respective location and clinical outcome of the first two episodes of sigmoid diverticulitis.

 

Method 

We reviewed the charts of 60 patients [median age 61 (range 31-90) years] who were admitted initially for a first episode of uncomplicated left colonic diverticulitis, and who were eventually readmitted for a second episode, both being documented by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan.

 

Results 

The median delay between the two episodes was 19 (3-97) months. Six (10%) patients developed a second complicated episode of diverticulitis [Hinchey II (n = 2), CT-guided percutaneous drainage; Hinchey III (n = 3), emergency Hartmann's operation; colovesical fistula (n = 1), elective sigmoid resection]. Fifty-four (90%) patients were admitted for a second episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis. In this group, the duration of hospital stay [11 (4-22) vs 10 (1-39) days, P = 0.28], serum levels of C-reactive protein [131 (31-350) vs 112 (22-333) m<sc>m</sc>, P = 0.62] and CT scan-based severity score [3 (1-6) vs 3 (0-7) points, P = 0.07] were similar between the two episodes. In 19 out of 54 (35%) patients with simple recurrent diverticulitis, although disease severity was similar, the disease topography differed and recurrence involved another segment of the left colon.

 

Conclusion 

The majority of patients who develop recurrence do so in a similar mode and location. However, 10% develop complicated diverticulitis and in 35% of patients recurrent diverticulitis occurs at a different location.

 

 

in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2012 Apr;14(4):463-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02642.x