Dr Pascal Gervaz

Chirurgien FMH, chirurgie interne & chirurgie viscérale

 

 

Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated by Preoperative Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Prospective Study

 

 

 

by Allal AS, Gervaz P, Gertsch P, Bernier J, Roth AD, Morel P, Bieri S.

 

 

Abstract

Purpose

To assess prospectively the quality of life (QOL) of patients treated by preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

 

Methods and Materials

We studied 53 patients treated with bi-fractionated RT (50 Gy in 40 fractions within 4 weeks) followed at a median interval of 45 days by abdominoperineal resection in 11 patients and low anterior resection in 42 patients. Their QOL was assessed using two self-rating questionnaires developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): one was cancer specific (EORTC QLQ-C30) and one was site specific (EORTC QLQ-C38). The questionnaires were completed before RT and 12-16 months after RT, at which time 17 patients had undergone colostomy. We hypothesized that at least some scores of the various scales would vary between the two analyses.

 

Results

Compared with the pre-RT scores, at 1 year, patients reported statistically significant improvement in their emotional state (median 75 vs. 100, p <0.0001), perspective of the future (67 vs. 100, p = 0.0004), and their global QOL (75 vs. 83, p = 0.0008), as well as a decrease in GI symptoms (13 vs. 0, p = 0.002). However, the sexual dysfunction score increased significantly, particularly in men (17 vs. 83, p = 0.0045), and a trend toward a lower body image score was observed (100 vs. 89, p = 0.068). At 1 year, patients with colostomies reported similar or significantly improved symptom scores for fatigue, pain, GI problems, and sleep disturbance, but no such improvements were observed in patients without stomas.

 

Conclusion

One year after combined treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, patients exhibited statistically significant improvement in some important QOL outcomes, including global QOL, despite a decrease in sexual function and body image. Any additional improvement in QOL outcome may require refinements in the RT and surgical techniques to reduce late sequelae, particularly sexual dysfunction. Our results suggest that QOL considerations do not justify sphincter-conserving approaches if locoregional tumor control would be compromised.


Back to top

 

 

 

in International JournalP of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Hysics 2005 Mar 15; 61(4): 1129-35